#Usp nf 37 free

In case of a dispute or question of interpretation, the language of the official text, alone and independent of the Commentary, shall prevail. If there is a difference between the contents of the Commentary and the official text, the official text prevails. Rather, it explains the basis of Expert Committees responses to public comments on proposed revisions. The Commentary is not part of the official text and is not intended to be enforceable by regulatory authorities. In cases when proposals advance to official status without re-publication in PF, a summary of comments received and the appropriate Expert Committee's responses are published in the Revisions and Commentary section of USP.org at the time the official revision is published. After comments are considered and incorporated as the Expert Committee deems appropriate, the proposal may advance to official status or be re-published in PF for further notice and comment, in accordance with the Rules.

#Usp nf 37 free

Commentary USP 42NF 37, First Supplement FebruIn accordance with USPs Rules and Procedures of the Council of Experts (Rules), and except as provided in Section 7.02 Accelerated Revision Processes, USP publishes proposed revisions to the United States Pharmacopeia and the National Formulary (USPNF) for public review and comment in the Pharmacopeial Forum (PF), USPs free bimonthly journal for public notice and comment.